Legal Opinion

Beal Bank v. Melville Magnetic Resonance Imaging, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated March 29, 1999, which granted the motion.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

“[A] document comes within CPLR 3213 ‘if a prima facie case would be made out by the instrument and a failure to make the payments called for by its terms’ ” (Weissman v Sinorm Deli, 88 NY2d 437, 444, quoting Interman Indus. Prods. v R.S.M. Electron…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Weissman v. Sinorm Deli, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp. v. Hellas TelecommunicationsNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Russo v. O'MearaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API