Legal Opinion

Vitale Bros. v. Wurtz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1965No. 3107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.

A lessee erected a “diner” upon a certain lot in Canton. The plaintiff constructed the concrete foun dation for the diner, together with walks, paved parking area, and brick basement.

The lessee defaulted, forfeited his lease to the landowners, and the diner was repossessed and removed under a conditional sales contract upon which it had been bought.

The plaintiff perfected a mechanic’s lien against the premises, but, although it had notice of the default and forfeiture, it did not perform or tender performance of the lease or attempt to obtain any rights under Section 1311.09, Revised Code.

Remo…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romito Bros. Electric Construction Co. v. Frank A. Flannery, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API