Legal Opinion

MacAw v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1930No. 5354PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Action to recover damages for negligent operation of defendant’s locomotive from which sparks were alleged to have been thrown setting fire to weeds and rubbish on right of way which burned through to plaintiff’s land, damaging his trees and crop of rye. On trial of the cause to court and jury a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict and order denying motion for new trial.

Approximately 100 feet south of the border line of plaintiff’s property in Filer are defendant’s tracks on its right of way, running east and west. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Finkelston v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Clark v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Holt v. Spokane & Palouse Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Swenson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API