Legal Opinion

Cortright v. American Ice Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1926No. Appeal 60PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This action arises out of an automobile collision. The appellant’s complaint is that the court erred in not giving binding instructions for the defendant or in refusing to enter judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. The collision occurred at the intersection of Fox Street and Hunting Park Avenue. The plaintiff’s car, a Studebaker roadster driven by Mrs. Cortright, was moving eastwardly on the avenue; the driver of the defendant’s truck made a left turn on to Fox Street going southwardly and in so doing brought the car in contact with the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kuneck v. ContiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shoemaker v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API