Legal Opinion

Commission of Investigation v. Lombardozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.

We consider together appeals by seven respondents in separate proceedings seeking a review of orders made at Special Term. Procedural differences in disposing of the applications at Special Term require the preliminary statement that five respondents (Prank Valenti, Mancuso, Riccobono, Castellano and Miranda) appeal from orders made by Spector, J., and two respondents (Lombardozzi and Peter Valenti) appeal from orders by Tilzer, J.

In August, 1958 the appellants were served with subpoenas issued by the Commission of Investigation of the State of New York commanding them to appear at a public…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Feldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Knapp v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. In re Di BrizziNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gentile v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  2. Henry v. New York State Commission of InvestigationNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. GumbsNew York Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API