Legal Opinion
Lisle v. Shipp
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1929No. Docket No. 5548PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
According to the petition or corn-plaint filed in the court helow, the following facts appear: Haden Securities Company, Inc., is a California corporation having 10,000 shares, of which petitioner is owner of 200 shares. E. S. Shipp is the owner of more than 5,000 shares, and is president of the corporation. His wife, E. H. Shipp, is the owner of 100 shares, and is the secretary and treasurer of the corporation. Shipp and his wife are two of the three directors, and are, therefore, in practical control of the business of the corporation.
Metropolitan Finance Corporation is a California…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. D. B. Martin Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1913
- Nat. Bank Etc. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. Sherman Oil CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Woodworth v. Old Second National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- South Side Bank v. T. S. B. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Danziger v. LuseOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Feldman v. San Mateo Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re Calpine Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008