Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Jackson v. Washington

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 28, 1999No. 97 C 6893Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

Petitioner Jamie Jackson seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on two claims: (1) petitioner’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated because his trial counsel was ineffective for a number of reasons; and (2) petitioner’s Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was sentenced to a term of natural life for the offense of first degree murder. Petitioner was convicted of murdering a gas station attendant during a robbery by striking the victim on the head with a gas cylinder.

After petitioner’s conviction following a bench trial, but before…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Juan Verdin v. Michael O'Leary and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. People v. BealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API