United States Ex Rel. Jackson v. Washington
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Petitioner Jamie Jackson seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on two claims: (1) petitioner’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated because his trial counsel was ineffective for a number of reasons; and (2) petitioner’s Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was sentenced to a term of natural life for the offense of first degree murder. Petitioner was convicted of murdering a gas station attendant during a robbery by striking the victim on the head with a gas cylinder.
After petitioner’s conviction following a bench trial, but before…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Juan Verdin v. Michael O'Leary and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- People v. BealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988