Legal Opinion

Heath v. Gloster

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 36,486PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for rehearing in the case of Heath v. Gloster,260 Mich. 85, a law action, is denied. Dirr v. Hitchman,260 Mich. 179, is an equity suit involving the equitable claims of the respective parties. These we cannot consider on appeal in a law action where there has been a notice of forfeiture of an executory land contract, followed, after fair trial, by valid judgment for restitution duly entered both by the circuit court commissioner, and, on appeal, by the circuit court.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dirr v. HitchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Heath v. GlosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Younglove v. Graham & HillWyoming Supreme Court · 1974