Legal Opinion
State v. Ball
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1991No. 57707PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatia, J.
Defendant-appellant, Mildon Ball, appeals from his conviction for the offense of possessing criminal tools. In addition, the appellant appeals from the judgment of the trial court which denied the appellant's motion to suppress. The appellant's appeal is well taken.
I. THE FACTS
A. THE INVESTIGATORY STOP AND WARRANTLESS SEARCH
On October 31, 1988, two members of the Cleveland Police Department were on patrol in the Outhwaite projects located at East 55 and Woodland Avenue. At 10:45 p.m., the police officers observed a van, which con tained two individuals (the appellant and George Chandler),…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DavieOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. VanderhoffOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GrantMedina County Court of Common Pleas · 2002
- Village of McComb v. Andrews, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000