Legal Opinion

Rosenblatt v. Bergen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

This is an action for commissions. The plaintiffs claim, as brokers, to have found a purchaser who was ready, willing and able to purchase the property of the defendant Bergen upon terms *221agreed upon. The defendant, apparently, before the transaction was closed, backed out of the proposition and demanded $10,000 more which those interested in the purchase refused to give, and the matter fell through. In order to recover, however, the plaintiffs are bound to show that they first found a purchaser ready, willing and able to complete the purchase.

This purchase was to be made in the name…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walton v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Goldmann v. Isaac Goldmann Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Door Knob Realty, Inc. v. NorthropNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API