Peet v. Beers
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Nolle Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
Peet recovered judgment at law in the Nolle Circuit Court against one Nimmons. At the time of the recovery, Nimmons owned no real estate. He subsequently purchased a tract of land in Nolle county, paid part of the purchase-money, received a deed, and simultaneously therewith executed to the vendor a mortgage on the premises to secure the residue. The Peet judgment still remained unpaid at the date of the purchase.
Nimmons then sold the land to Beers, who assumed the payment of the mortgage as one part of the consideration; the residue he paid at the time of the purchase. Beers, in ignorance,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re HoweNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
- Aldridge v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hancock v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Birke v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Muir v. BerkshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Troost v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Spray v. RodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.