Legal Opinion

Phipps v. Chesson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1996No. 96-26PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

hDECUIR, Judge.

This is an appeal by Manufacturers Hanover Wheelease, Inc. and Continental Insurance Company from the judgment of the trial court maintaining the exception of no cause of action filed by defendant-appellee, Skipper Drost. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in holding there was no cause of action for unjust enrichment/return of a thing unduly received against Drost who was a payee on a check tendered as payment on a judgment later overturned by devolutive appeal. We reverse.

Manufacturers took a devolutive appeal from a default judgment in favor of Andrew and Susie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. Louisiana Health Service & Indem. Co. v. ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Great American Indemnity Company v. DauzatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Williams v. HattanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. State, Department of Highways v. BuschSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. Dr. XLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API