Williams v. Ulmer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Dantzler, J., Barnwell, October, 1904, Action by Lillian Williams against James M. Ulmer and Minnie L. Ulmer. From decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal. cites: 9 S. C., 283; 21 S. C., 17; 30 S. €., 335; 30 S. C., 614; Rule 57, of Circuit Court, 7 S. C., 235; 1 S, C., 283. cites: 41 S. C., 346; 24 S. C., 468; 34 S. C„ 154; Williams v. Moore, 29 S. C.; 21 S. C., 17; Bail. Eq., 350.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Woods.
In order to understand the questions arising in this appeal it is necessary to make clear the scope of the action as it appears from' the complaint and the evidence. James M. Ulmer conveyed to his wife, Minnie L. Ulmer, on June 23, 1888, a tract of land containing about 335 acres, the consideration expressed in the deed being $1,500. The plaintiff, Lillian Williams, recovered a judgment against James M. Ulmer in November, 1899; execution was issued, and the sheriff thereafter laid off to the judgment debtor 135 acres of the tract of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barrett v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Outlaw v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Funderburg v. Augusta & Aiken Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908