Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Judge

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1989No. 13898 and 13911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCacioppo, P. J.

The city of Barber-ton 1 and Ohio Council 8, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (“AFSCME”), each appeal the trial court’s judgment that declared unconstitutional Section 6.04(a) of the Charter of the city of Barberton (“Section 6.04[a]”). The trial court enjoined the mayor and a city council member from serving on the Barberton Board of Health. In findings incorporated by reference into the judgment, the trial court stated that the Barberton Board of Health is a political subdivision of the state and that board of health employees are not city employees.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Elyria v. TrubeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Harrison v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API