Legal Opinion
Thompson v. The Nith
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 30, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.
The libelants, Edward J. De Hart and William Honey-man, doing business as partners under the firm name and style of Thompson, De Hart & Co., bring this suit against the British bark Kith on a contract of affreightment to recover damages in the sum of $3,700.17 for a violation thereof.
It is alleged in the libel that in February, 1887, the libelants shipped on the bark, then lying at the port of Liverpool, England, and bound on a voyage to the port of Portland, about 24 tons of Swedish iron, and 52 anvils, weighing about 7,017 pounds, in good order and condition, and worth at this port…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. JureySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bracket v. M'NairNew York Supreme Court · 1817
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mitsui & Co., Ltd. And Ataka & Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. American Export Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Armstrong Cork Canada, Ltd., and Armstrong Cork Company v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Mitsui & Co. v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Northern Commercial Co. v. LindblomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Steamship Wellesley Co. v. C. A. Hooper & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- United S. S. Co. v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.