Legal Opinion

Hoard v. Maddox

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1947No. 15777PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Chief Justice.

1. On the trial of a claim case involving the bona fides of a deed of conveyance, it is improper to instruct the jury that “transactions between near relatives are to be scanned with care and scrutinized closely, and slight evidence of fraud shown between them may be sufficient to set the transaction aside,” in the absence of qualification that this rule does not apply unless .there is proof otherwise suggesting fraud. McCallie v. McCallie, 192 Ga. 699, 701 (16 S. E. 2d, 562). See also Elge v. Calhoun National Bank, 155 Ga. 821 (118 S. E. 359). The impropriety in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Martin v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. McLendon v. Reynolds Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Nelson v. SpenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Liberty Lumber Co. v. SilasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. Mayor &C. of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Southeast Transport Corp. v. Hogan Livestock Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Black v. New Holland Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Carsten v. Wilkes Supermarket of Gwinnett County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API