Legal Opinion

Doe v. North Homes, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 11, 2020No. 0:18-cv-03419Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jane Doe (a pseudonym), Case No. 18-cv-3419 (WMW/LIB) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO North Homes, Inc.; Devin Michael Wood; ALTER, AMEND, OR SEEK RELIEF Connie Ross; John Does 1 - 5; and John FROM JUDGMENT Does 6 - 10, Defendants. Plaintiff Jane Doe moves to amend the complaint or, in the alternative, to alter, amend, or seek relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Dkt. 65.) Because Doe has not established a manifest error…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Parnes v. Gateway 2000, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States Ex Rel. Roop v. Hypoguard USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Jerry R. Skelton v. Pri-Cor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Larry J. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API