Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 1996No. 94-03710Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUINCE, Judge.

Appellant, Arthur Lee Thomas, challenges the trial court’s order imposing adult sanctions. He also appeals the imposition of certain costs. We affirm the imposition of costs but remand for entry of an order imposing adult sanctions consistent with section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1993).

Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to charges of aggravated battery and burglary. Appellant, who was sixteen, was sentenced on September 6,1994, to four years of prison on each count, to run concurrently. Although the trial court stated that pursuant to section 39.059, appellant was suitable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wideman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API