Legal Opinion

Farmers' State Bank v. Kirkland Brackin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1917No. 4 Div. 662PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court, Henry County ; O. S. Lewis, Chancellor. Bill by the Farmers’ State Bank against Kirkland & Brackin and others. Decree sustaining claim of precedence of defendant F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Company, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j..

The original bill was filed by the Farmers’ State Bank, as mortgagee of E. E. Kirkland and H. L. Brackin, constituting the firm styled Kirkland & Brackin, against them and I-I. O. Price and F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Company, a corporation. The bill sought the foreclosure of its mortgages, the appointment of. a receiver of the property of the insolvent mortgagors, and the administration of the properties of the estate to the end that those entitled and as entitled thereto might have their rights ascertained, determined, and satisfied therefrom. The Mayer Company was averred to be a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whilden & Sons v. Merchants' & Planters' National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Rogers v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Gunter v. HinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Gillespie v. McCleskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. J. M. Card Lumber Co. v. OzementSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ConradiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Bianco v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Mitchell v. ConwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Adams v. Mathieson Alabama Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Martin v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API