W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Durham Sandwich Company, Inc., and Austin R. Pendergraft
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge:
The District Court found that Carl Davis was “regularly and recurrently engaged in interstate commerce” 1 within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act and ordered Durham Sandwich Co., his employer, to pay him overtime wages unlawfully withheld in the amount of $1,209.90. 2 The employer’s appeal advances the argument that Davis was not “engaged in commerce.” 3 After thoroughly reviewing the District Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, we affirm.
Durham Sandwich Company, Inc., is a North Carolina corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New Mexico Public Service Co. v. EngelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Davis v. Goodman Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Raul C. Montalvo v. Tower Life Building and Tower Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Boekemeier v. FOURTH UNIVER. SOCIETY IN CITY OF NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Donovan v. Kentwood Development Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Jerome v. Zorich and Robert Wirkkala v. Long Beach Fire Department and Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Russell v. Continental Restaurant, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.