Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Fipps

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 2018No. 04-17-00337-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Appellee Jake Fipps developed an anastomotic leak after his gastric bypass surgery. Fipps and his wife (Appellees) sued Appellant Charles Schwartz III, D.O., the bariatric surgeon, alleging that the "surgical procedure failed." Dr. Schwartz challenged Appellees' initial and supplemental expert reports, and the trial court dismissed the suit for an inadequate report. In Appellees' motion for new trial, they argued the supplemental report showed their theory of the case had changed to a postoperative-care complaint, and their expert was qualified to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PalaciosTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bowie Memorial Hospital v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dr. Robert L. Hogue, M.D. and Brownwood Regional Medical Center v. Brandon Steward and Courtney Steward, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2022
  2. Jose Vazquez-Vicente, M.D. D/B/A Advanced Health Institute for Women's Health, P.A. v. Priscilla Villarreal-Trevino, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2022
  3. Thomas A. "Kip" Hyde and Robert L. Winspear v. GACP Finance Co., LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API