Demedrano v. Labor Finders of the Treasure Coast
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
2Per curiam
Appellant’s motion for certification is DENIED. On the merits, our opinion remains unchanged. We write only to clarify our opinion. Therefore, we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute this opinion in its place.
Claimant’s attorneys challenge the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC) order denying reimbursement for paralegal costs. They argue the JCC erred by finding he had jurisdiction to review costs to be reimbursed to claimant’s attorneys from settlement proceeds and that paralegal time is not a reimbursable cost but is, instead, included within attorney…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Murray v. Mariner HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Loper v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Pace v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOLDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Dayco Products v. McLaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Heymann v. FreeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Cyphers v. GULFSTREAM ROOFING, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Castellon v. RC ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Cyphers v. Gulfstream Roofing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- McGill v. a & D Installations of Wellington, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- PHILLIP S. LANE v. Workforce Business Services, Inc. etc., etalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.