Legal Opinion

Bernhamer v. Hoffman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1899No. 2,749PublishedCited by 4 opinions

. From the Márion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Eobinson, J. —

The sufficiency of appellee’s complaint is the Only question presented. The suit is on an appeal bond.

The complaint avers that appellee sued one'Arbenz, before a justice of the peace, “for possession” of certain lands, described, and “for damages for the unlawful detention thereof,” that he recovered judgment “for the possession of” the lands and a certain sum as “damages for the detention thereof;” that Arbenz appealed to the circuit court and filed an appeal bond, which is set out, with appellants as sureties; that after the appeal was docketed in the circuit court, it was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pence v. AugheIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hopper v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Farris v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Jolly v. GheringIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Frazer v. State ex rel. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Jones v. LeedsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Davis v. BickelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API