Legal Opinion

Miller v. Owens

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2011No. 52A05-1012-CP-742PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Appellanb-Plaintiff Mari Miller (“Miller”) challenges the Miami Circuit Court’s order finding that Appellee-Third Party Defendant/Garnishee Defendant Waterford Place (“Waterford”) was not in contempt of the court’s garnishment order. On appeal, Miller presents three issues, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court erred by failing to apply the law-of-the-case doctrine;

II. Whether the trial court erred in concluding that Waterford’s legal arguments were not precluded by offensive collateral estoppel; and

III. Whether the trial court erred in concluding that Waterford…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doe v. TobiasIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mims v. Commercial Credit CorporationIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kinslow v. GEICO Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Serletic v. NoelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Dennerline v. AtterholtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Thomson Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Northern Assurance Co. of America, Successor in Interest to Certain Liabilites of Employers Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Thomson Inc. k/n/a Technicolor, USA, Inc., Technicolor Inc.,/Technicolor LimitedIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Victor C. Regalado v. The Estate of Joseph James Regalado, and Paula HeffelfingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API