Legal Opinion
Kemco Sales, Inc. v. Control Papers Co., Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 29, 1998No. 97-CIV-1291(WGB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge.
Defendants Control Papers Company, Inc. (“CPC”) and Rodney Diplock move for partial summary judgment, asking this Court to hold that their tamper-evident envelope called TripLok Safe-Pak (“TripLok Bag”) does not infringe the U.S.Patent 5,405,197, entitled “Tamper Evident Sealing System For Envelope & Method of Making Same” (“ ’197 Patent”) of Plaintiffs Kemco Sales Inc. (“Kemco”) and Kenneth R. Makowka. Plaintiffs cross-move for partial summary judgment, asking this Court to rule that Defendants’ TripLok Bag literally infringes claim 27 of the ’197 Patent. This…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kemco Sales, Inc. v. Control Papers Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Sule v. Kloehn Co., Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001