Legal Opinion

Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Crapps

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 1980No. SS-209PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

2Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of an order denying its motion to dismiss or transfer for improper venue. We find that appellant’s notice of interlocutory appeal was untimely filed. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(b). Since there is no provision in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure authorizing a motion for rehearing directed to an interlocutory order, Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc., 263 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1972), appellant’s motion for rehearing directed to the interlocutory *892order denying its motion to dismiss or transfer for improper venue did not suspend rendition of such order, and…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Florida E. Coast Ry. Co. v. S. SANITATION SERVICE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc. v. Advisory Board, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hofer v. Gil De RubioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API