Legal Opinion
Fate v. Owens
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 2001No. 20,682PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} This case presents issues of first impression concerning the rights and responsibilities of general and limited partners in a limited partnership. Petitioners, Donald R. Fate, Margaret Fate, a/k/a Marjorie Fate, and Celia B. Milavec, who are limited partners, appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their claims against Patricia Owens a/k/a Sichler (Owens), the general partner, and other entities related to Owens (collectively Respondents). Respondents filed a cross-appeal, arguing that the trial court erred when it took them claims for costs and attorney fees…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Coates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- GCM, Inc. v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Engl Ex Rel. Plymouth Plaza Associates v. BergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walta v. Gallegos Law Firm, P.C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hill v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Losey v. Norwest Bank of New Mexico, N.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Valerio v. San Mateo Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bull v. BGK Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.