Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Hathaway

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1984No. 14577PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to construe a section of the Idaho Code which governs the disposition of a security deposit paid by a tenant to a landlord. The tenant, Carolyn Fleming, paid a $100 security deposit to the landlords, Thomas and Rayma Hathaway, as provided in the Hathaways’ standard form lease agreement. Later, Mrs. Fleming terminated her tenancy and requested return of the deposit. When the deposit was not returned she brought this action. In the magistrate division of the district court, the trial judge held the Hathaways were entitled to retain the deposit,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Werry v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hunter v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Loughrey v. WeitzelIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hull v. GieslerIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Magic Valley Truck Brokers, Inc. v. MeyerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Melaleuca, Inc. v. FoellerIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Gregory Hull v. Richard GieslerIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API