Legal Opinion

Mississippi Employment Security Commission v. Nordstrom

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 4, 2003No. 2002-CC-01522-COAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS, J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. Andrew Nordstrom filed a claim for unemployment benefits with the Mississippi Employment Security Commission. The claims examiner held that Nordstrom was entitled to benefits because Tyson had failed to show Nordstrom was discharged for misconduct. The appeals referee reversed the decision of the claims examiner finding that Nordstrom failed to show good cause for leaving his employment. The board of review affirmed this decision, and Nordstrom appealed to the Circuit Court of Warren County. The circuit court reversed, finding that Nordstrom reasonably believed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. ArriolaMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Richardson v. Employment SEC. Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hoerner Boxes, Inc. v. MESCMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Huckabee v. MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. NCI Building Components v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API