Legal Opinion

Ricks v. Hanover Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1989No. A89A0027PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Appellant Edgar Ricks appeals from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of appellee the Hanover Insurance Company on appellant’s claim for penalties, attorney fees and punitive damages pursuant to OCGA § 33-34-6. Held:

1. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has failed to adhere to the rules of this court by omitting specific references to the record in support of the statement of facts contained in his brief is denied. See, e.g., Gerdes v. Dziewinski, 182 Ga. App. 764 (1) (357 SE2d 110) (1987).

2. OCGA § 33-34-6 provides, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. PresleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Strickland v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Gerdes v. DziewinskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wages v. Atlanta Metro Taxicab Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API