Legal Opinion

Miller v. Kings Highway Hospital, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*533Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by granting the plaintiffs’ motion to quash the subpoena served on the American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Since the injured plaintiff’s main cause of action to recover damages for the loss of enjoyment of life relates to his inability to perform surgery rather than his inability to engage in recreational activities, the subpoenaed documents are not material and necessary to the defense of this action (see, CPLR 3101 [a]; Titleserv, Inc. v Zenobio, 210 AD2d 314).

Likewise,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Titleserv, Inc. v. ZenobioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Huntington Tobacco Co., Money Pension & Profit Sharing Fund v. FromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palermo Mason Construction, Inc. v. Aark Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Collado v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. Euba v. EubaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API