Legal Opinion

Fine v. Lyons

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 16, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Action by Samuel Fine against Mary Lyons. From an order of the City Court of the City of New York, denying the defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, defendant appeals. Reversed, and motion to vacate the attachment granted.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The action is brought to recover the reasonable value of services alleged to have been rendered to the defendant by the plaintiff as attorney. The damages are therefore unliquidated. The attachment sought to be vacated was granted upon the complaint and affidavits setting forth the cause of action; but.the only statements contained therein which have any bearing upon the amount of damages are to the effect that between certain dates Crosby & Fine rendered services to the defendant as attorneys and counselors at law, at her request and upon her retainer, which were “of the reasonable value of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Delafield v. J. K. Armsby Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Haskell v. OsbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Dudley v. Armenia Insurance of PittsburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Calmon Asbestos & Rubber Works of America v. Asbest-Und-GummiwerkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Ingalls Stone Co. v. NunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prentiss v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Fine v. LyonsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API