Legal Opinion

Brons v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided November 27, 1985No. 84-1776-CivPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ATKINS, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the issue of whether plaintiff may maintain an action under Florida’s Wrongful Death Act. Defendant Beech Aircraft asserts that the action is controlled exclusively by the Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C. § 761 et seq. In addition, Defendant Hart-zog has moved for summary judgment based on the affidavit of Virgil Smith and Donald Pond.

1. Defendant Hartzog’s Motion:

Rule 56 provides:

When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chute v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
  3. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Hooker v. Raytheon CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1962
  5. Alexander v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Icelandic Coast Guard v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
  2. Blome v. Aerospatiale Helicopter Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  3. Palischak v. Allied Signal Aerospace Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API