Legal Opinion · Dissent

James H. Tipler v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 3, 2014No. 1D13-4408Published

1DissentOsterhaus, J.

I respectfully dissent and would not remand this case because the record conclusively refutes the allegations in Mr. Ti-pler’s motion to withdraw plea. See Johnson v. State, 22 So.3d 840, 845 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (finding harmless error in the trial court’s summary denial of a motion to withdraw plea because the motion’s allegation was conclusively refuted by the record); Gumbs v. State, 143 So.3d 1160, 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (noting that if the record did not conclusively refute a defendant’s allegations, then he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing).

Mr..Tipler sought to withdraw his plea…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Liston T. Gumbs, Jr. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API