Legal Opinion
Franklin v. County of Riverside
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 18, 1997No. CV 96-5289-SVW(RC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
WILSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as plaintiffs objections filed July 10, 1997, and has made a de novo determination.
IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing without prejudice the complaint and action…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Susag v. City of Lake ForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Nuno v. County of San BernardinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
- Curry v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007