Legal Opinion

Trankla v. McLean

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■ Appeal from a judgment of the District Court in the city of Hew York for the first judicial district, rendered by the justice, without" a jury, in favor of the plaintiff. Action for damages for fraud and deceit.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The plaintiffs sued for, and have obtained a recovery of a sum of money paid by them to the defendant, the action proceeding upon allegations of fraud and deceit in inducing the payment, under a state of facts disclosed by the record as follows:

In the month of October, 1895, the plaintiffs, a firm in business at Grand Rapids, Michigan, received a circular letter from the firm of R. & H. Adams, a milling concern, soliciting orders for mosquito netting, and in response to this they sent an order for a certain quantity of the goods, the transaction, thus far, being had directly with the Adams…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Elwell v. . ChamberlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Smith v. . CountrymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Fishkill Savings Institution v. National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Forster v. WilshusenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. HenryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lynch v. RabeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  3. Frank V. Strauss & Co. v. Welsbach Gas Lamp Co.New York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Rankin v. Colonial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API