Ardon v. Committee for Public Counsel Services
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
“A complaint in the nature of mandamus is ‘a call to a government official to perform a clear cut duty,’ and the remedy is limited to requiring action on the part of the government official.” Simmons v. Clerk-Magistrate of the Boston Div. of the Hous. Court Dep’t, 448 Mass. 57, 59-60, (2006), quoting Doe v. District Attorney for the Plymouth Dist., 29 Mass. App. Ct. 671, 675 (1991). Such an action “is appropriate to compel a public official to perform an act which the official has a legal duty to perform.” Lutheran Serv. Ass’n of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dist. Comm’n, 397 Mass. 341,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ConceicaoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Mains v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Lutheran Service Ass'n of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Myrick v. Superior Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Monteiro v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Banevicius v. BarnstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
- Chawla v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.