First National Bank v. Innes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 301, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Bradford Co., Dec. T., 1911, No. 317, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of First National Bank of Canton v. John A. Innes. Amicable action to determine defendant’s liability on a note. Before Maxwell, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 301, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Bradford Co., Dec. T., 1911, No. 317, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of First National Bank of Canton v. John A. Innes. Amicable action to determine defendant’s liability on a note. Before Maxwell, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Subsequently the court entered judgment for defendant n. o. v. Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant n. o. v.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Williams, J.,
Plaintiff declared on the following note: “$100.00 Canton, Pa., Jan. 17,1901. On demand after date, for value received, I promise to pay to L. T. McFadden, Cashier, or bearer the sum of One Hundred Dollars at the First National Bank of Canton, with interest and without defalcation, waiving stay of execution, all exemption laws, inquisition, errors, and appeal. And I hereby confess judgment against me for the above sum with interest and cost and Avith five per cent, additional for collection fees, *427and with the above stated waivers. And I do further agree that the holder…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cook v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Valiant Co. v. Pleasonton & Pa. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Anthracite Trust Company CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944