Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 1981No. [No. 108 September Term, 1979.]Published

1Dissent

*656 Smith, J.,

dissenting:

I think that Mr. Conti is entitled to receive the strongest type of reprimand for approaching a trial judge out of the presence of counsel to make a recommendation not contained in his written presentence report. Anyone in his position, with the possible exception of a complete neophyte, certainly knows better than to engage in this type of conduct. However, so far as I can determine from the record in this case the only thing not contained in the official report was that recommendation for a life sentence.

I am much inclined to agree with the opinion of Judge Moore for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API