In re Luna

I dissent from the holding that the case does not present any compelling reasons for this court’s taking review of the interlocutory discovery order of the Board of Governors.1 For, in my opinion, appellant Douglas Luna has raised a significant issue of law as to the scope of discovery in bar admission matters, the immediate resolution of which might possibly expedite resolution of this already overly protracted administrative appeal.

As I see it, the issue which calls for review is whether Alaska Bar Rule 1-4, *793Section 5 fixes the outer limits of discovery in bar admission matters, or whether…