Legal Opinion
Rodney Hunt Machine Co. v. Stewart
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Action by the Bodney Hunt Machine Company against James M. Stewart and William B. Stewart for the conversion of four sets of water-wheels. There was a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMayham, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment upon the decision of a judge, upon a trial before him at a special term without a jury. The action was for the alleged conversion by the appellants and the Hew York Pulp Company of four sets or pairs of water-wheels furnished by the plaintiff to the New York Pulp Company under the following agreement:
“Hadley, N. Y., April 11, 1887.
“Bodney Hunt Machine Company: You will please manufacture and ship to the undersigned at Hadley, N. Y., four (4) sets or pairs of twenty-four (24) inch water-wheels, per plan submitted and described in letters; in consideration of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Austin v. . DyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Wait v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Frank v. BattenNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Dudley v. HawleyNew York Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by8 opinions
- Debobes v. ButterlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- McCrea v. McClenahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Aeroglide Corp. v. ZehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Lippman Packing Corp. v. RoseCity of New York Municipal Court · 1953
- American Laundry Machinery Co. v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.