Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). According to the evidence of Joe Phillips, the decision of the chancellor was correct. Accepting his testimony as representing the true facts in the case, Joe Phillips took the land upon a condition .subsequent; the sole consideration' for the conveyance to him by his father was the home comfort he was to give to his father and the support of his mother in her declining years, if she should outlive her husband. Thus, under the real consideration of the deed, a continuous and fixed duty rested upon the son to support his mother. He admitted in his own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salyers v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  2. Priest v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Leonard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Whittaker v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Goodwin v. TysonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petree v. PetreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Cain v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Cannon v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Eakin v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Hendrix v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API