Legal Opinion

MacLellan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 14, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The substituted declaration in this case contains two counts under the employers’ liability act. One alleges a defect in the ways, works, appliances and mechanism used in connection with the business of the'defendant, and the other alleges the negligence of a person in the service of the employer, whose sole or principal duty was that of superintendence.

The plaintiffs are daughters of Alexander MacLellan and seek to recover for his instantaneous death while in the employ of the defendant.

It appeared that the deceased was an experienced lineman, who had worked as such for various electric…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McIsaac v. Northampton Electric Lighting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Carriere v. Merrick Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Tanner v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Chisholm v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. McCoy v. Inhabitants of WestboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernabeo v. KaulbackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Winston v. Converse Rubber Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API