Montana Nat. Bank v. Schmidt
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from Third District, Lewis and Clarice County.
1Opinion of the CourtBach, J.
The complaint in this cause shows that this action was brought to reform and foreclose a mortgage executed by John M. Schmidt, in his life-time, and Elizabeth Schmidt, his wife, to secure a promissory note given by John M. Schmidt to George Steell, and by Steell assigned to plaintiff. There was an ■ erroneous description of the premises intended to be mortgaged, in this: the land intended to be mortgaged was described as being situated in township No. 2, instead of township No. 20, as the same was-intended (as alleged in the complaint) by the parties thereto. The answer denies the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leonis v. LazzarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Petesch v. HambachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Heaton v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Barrett v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hayford v. KocherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stealey v. LyonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BurghardtMontana Supreme Court · 1897
- Wiseman v. CrislipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913