Legal Opinion

Noreen v. Pharmerica Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2015No. Civil No. 14-2878 (RHK/SER)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Loren Noreen worked for Defendant Pharmerica Corporation (“Pharm-erica”) as a staff pharmacist in Fridley, Minnesota, for more than 38 years. After Pharmerica terminated his employment in December 2013, he commenced this action alleging age discrimination in violation of federal and state law. Presently before the Court is Pharmerica’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted.

BACKGROUND

When viewed in the light most favorable to Noreen, the record reveals the following…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nash v. Optomec, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API