Delay v. RICH'S, INCORPORATED
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
1. (a) The plaintiff was injured when she stumbled over a footstool in the defendant’s shoe department while she was shopping in the department. The acts of negligence claimed by the plaintiff to have been committed by the defendant were: leaving the footstool in a narrow aisle in the shoe department where she could stumble over it; having at the end of said aisle a metal object which produced a glare from the reflection of lights which partially blinded her; having insufficient lighting in the shoe department which left the floor of that department in a shadow and in darkness. We think that…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- King Hardware Co. v. TeplisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Miller v. BartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Slaughter v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Butts v. Academy of Beauty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.