Legal Opinion
Claim of Neville v. Magazine Distributors, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 29, 2008, which ruled that claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits was barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 28.
In his application for workers’ compensation benefits, claimant asserted that his disabling membranous nephropathy was an occupational disease caused by exposure to chemicals at his workplace. At the conclusion of his direct examination before a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge, however, his counsel conceded that the claim was for an accident rather than an occupational disease and that the date of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Huang Sheng Ku v. Dana Alexander, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Toner v. Michael Hanley Moving & StorageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Skippon v. T.M. Kenney's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bond v. Suffolk Transportation ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Brown v. New York City Department of CorrectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Li v. Southern Garden, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ross v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Claim of Hilbrandt v. Village of Red HookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.