Legal Opinion

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Hite

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 21, 1938No. 9699PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

The bill of complaint recites that defendant claimed to have been injured in a department store in Portland, Oregon, which was covered by public liability insurance, issued by plaintiff; • that plaintiff paid defendant $75 in settlement of defendant’s claim, taking defendant’s release in the usual form, releasing plaintiff’s assured “and others”; later, defendant made further claim on the ground that his injuries were more serious than he had believed, and plaintiff paid defendant an additional $125, taking a second release. Still later, ■ despite the sums paid and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. American Employers' Insurance v. LindquistDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API