Legal Opinion

Shirk v. Shultz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1888No. 13,074PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

-Appellant alleges in his complaint that, in October, 1884, when he was a minor, he entered into partnership with appellee for an indefinite time, in the business of upholstering and dealing in furniture, under the firm name of Shirk & Shultz; that he still is a minor; that he invested in the business $500; that the firm has on hand furniture and goods of the value of $850, and is in debt over $600; that “ he is advised by his guardian to renounce-such partnership and withdraw from said firm, and he hereby renounces such arrangement and asks to avoid, annul and undo all of his obligations in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Badger v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Rice v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Miles v. LingermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Carpenter v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Pitcher v. LaycockIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frye v. YasiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Shipley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Drumhiller v. Norick Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Lakey v. CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Friedman v. HuberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API