Legal Opinion
Levy v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 28, 2006No. Civil Action 06-269(RMU)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Defendant’s Motion to Transfer
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to transfer. Plaintiffs Mark Levy, Marc Bruh, and Elliot Scheier are respective shareholders of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., VistaCare, Inc., and AdvancePCS (now Caremark Rx, Inc.). The plaintiffs collectively bring suit alleging that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amendments to SEC rules 16b-3(d) and 16b-7 (“16b Amendments”) in violation of its rulemaking authority under Section 16(b) of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roseberry-Andrews v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Roseberry-Andrews v. JamesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. SLRA Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020